Sunday, June 28, 2009

Angelic poster girl left serious legacy

Article 6-29-09

Remembering Farrah Fawcett




by Margery Eagen
Monday, Jun. 29, 2009

Lost in the Michael Jackson tsunami was the premature death of another, more modest pop culture icon: Farrah Fawcett.

Jackson was an international superstar. Fawcett was uniquely American.

He was a troubled, tragic genius. Her talents were smaller, but noteworthy still.

His music, reaching nearly a billion people, dominated early ’80s sound. Her 1970s pin-up poster - the spectacular girl next door in the red one-piece - dominated the bedrooms of more than 12 million American boys and inspired as many girls to buy curling irons, blow dryers and Wella Balsam shampoo in a labor-intensive, forever futile attempt to flip their hair, too, into wispy golden wings.

Farrah Fawcett managed something else not easy in this culture, or any other. She surpassed expectations. She moved beyond the dim-witted, bottle-blond stereotype to become a respected actress. And as a woman who embodied much of what feminism disdained, she nonetheless brought massive attention to issues central to women’s rights: the brutality of rape and domestic violence.

One could aruge that her 1984 role in “The Burning Bed,” the story of a woman who endured 13 years of beatings before killing her husband, did more to bring an understanding of battered women’s syndrome to America than a thousand academic tomes. And in the mid-’80s, when rapists were rarely prosecuted and even more rarely jailed, she starred on Broadway and in the movies in “Extremities,” the story of a woman who gets revenge on her would-be rapist.

Almost nobody saw her finest acting performance as the preacher’s wife in Robert Duvall’s 1997 near-masterpiece, “The Apostle.” That was the same year she appeared on David Letterman rambling and barely coherent, which is what we do remember.

But fortunately, many more saw her final screen appearance: on TV, the riveting “video diary” of her struggle with cancer. There are no Beacon Street marches or glitzy fund-raisers to support the dare-not-speak-its name cancer she endured: cancer of the anus. You may recall, if you tuned in, seeing her bald head. Thus was the most copied, distinctive hair in late 20th century America taken, too, by cancer, the great leveler.

Wheelock College sociologist Gail Dines wonders whether Farrah Fawcett’s pin-up would get much attention in 2009, when our sex icons are “hyper-sexualized” and less dependent on nature than manmade additions. Fawcett had no surgically enhanced breasts, like the recently deposed Miss California or the models in the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition. There were no kinky overtones, like Britney Spears’ studs and leather or Jenna Jameson’s porn-star past. .

“She didn’t even wear a bikini. She just looked very wholesome,” like the cheerleader Farrah had been back in Corpus Christi, Texas, said Dines. But Farrah Fawcett wanted more than that. She tried really hard, persisting even when few took her seriously, or noticed. By the end, she had succeeded.


PINUP GIRL: Farrah Fawcett in the 1970s.
Photo shows, pin up girl of the 70's:
Farrah Fawcett


Bernabei, Graham, O'Reilly, Carr, Siciliano
Al Siciliano
Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Letterman's left hook a cheap shot

Article 6-22-09

Reviewing Palin/Letterman saga




by Bill O'Reilly
DNN Staff - EXCLUSIVE!
Monday, Jun. 22, 2009

That was some firestorm David Letterman found himself confronting, wasn’t it? Do you think the comedian had any idea his jokes mocking Gov. Sarah Palin and her family would lead to such condemnation? I don’t.

What Letterman and his writers failed to see is the growing anger in America over personal attacks leveled against public people. The issue is primarily about partisan insults. Many now consider Letterman a liberal guy, and so his remarks about Palin were viewed as more political than satirical.

According to a new Gallup Poll, 40 percent of Americans identify themselves as conservative, 35 percent say they are moderate and just 21 percent answer to the liberal description. Liberals are outnumbered by almost four to one. Thus, when a conservative icon such as Palin is demeaned by a high-profile entertainer who leans left, it becomes a big political story. Cable news and the blogs blow it up.

In the media world in which Letterman lives, many people are outspokenly liberal. New York City and Hollywood are unabashedly so. But the folks are not. And they do not want nasty stuff directed at a working mother like Palin, who holds traditional values. To hear the liberal pundits try to defend Letterman was something out of “The Twilight Zone.” They put forth that because 18-year-old Bristol Palin appeared with her mother at political rallies, she was fair game. Pure idiocy.

The folks also zeroed in on the hypocrisy of the Letterman-Palin situation. If somebody had mocked President Barack Obama’s family that way, they would be destroyed. There’s a difference between a president and a governor, but the analysis is valid.

What liberal entertainers do not understand is that Obama was elected because the economy collapsed under a Republican president. While some liberal zealots believe Obama’s ascension certified a national ideological move to the left, they are exceedingly wrong. The folks are closely watching Obama. And if the economy does not improve significantly, he’ll have a battle in 2012.

I believe Letterman when he says he’s sorry about the Palin dust-up. I don’t think he meant to hurt the Palin daughters; he’s not that kind of guy. But he definitely has an edge when it comes to people who do not fit into his ideological comfort zone.

Last time I was on his program, he called me a goon. It was the mean-spirited perception that dunked Letterman. Robust debate over issues has made America the great country it is. But increasingly, personal attacks are being used to marginalize opposing points of view. And when those attacks involve kids, even on the periphery, Americans will not stand for it.


Sarah Palin.
Shown above, Sarah Palin speaks out
on David
Letterman's apology.
(DNN Staff photo)


Bernabei, Graham, O'Reilly, Carr, Siciliano
Al Siciliano
Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Lax Legislature is no accident

Article 6-19-09


Lawmakers lenient towards elderly drivers



by Michael Graham
DNN Staff - EXCLUSIVE!
Friday, Jun. 19, 2009

Last week on my radio show, I speculated the only way Beacon Hill would finally do something about elderly drivers would be for an 80-something to run down a child in the street.

I was wrong. A child lies dead in Stoughton and our legislators are still too cowardly to act.

It’s a brutal political truth, but it must be spoken: The leadership of Beacon Hill would rather see dead bodies in the streets than the angry elderly in their offices.

This weekend, 89-year-old Ilse Horn ran down 4-year-old Diya Patel at a Stoughton crosswalk. A few hours later, this little girl was dead.

Just three weeks earlier, 75-year-old Parvin Niroomand crossed two lanes of traffic to hit and kill 33-year-old bicyclist Misty Bassi near UMass-Amherst. According to police reports, instead of stopping to help, Niroomand simply drove home.

In between these two tragedies, we’ve seen a 93-year-old crash through the walls of a Danvers Wal-Mart; a 73-year-old plow through the crowd at a Plymouth veteran’s memorial; and an 84-year-old slam into a storefront in Somerset.

What haven’t we seen? Any action by the gutless gentlemen (and ladies) of state government.

We are the only state in the country that grants licenses to 85-year-olds as though they were 35-year-olds, with no additional testing or screening.

According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, drivers 75 and older are more likely than any other group - including young drivers - to be involved in an accident with fatalities. Texas A&M found older drivers far more prone to wrecks caused by perception problems as opposed to speeding.

AAA found that drivers 85 and older have a fatality rate nearly four times higher than that of teens.

Dead children in the streets, spinning tires in our storefronts, a stack of statistics proving how dangerous older drivers are - and how is Beacon Hill reacting?

Cue the crickets.

It’s absolutely shameful. Democratic Sen. Steven Baddour of Methuen - where Piro’s Bakery recently had to pull an 87-year-old’s car out of its plate glass window - has had a bill before his committee for years. As a committee chairman in a one-party Legislature, Baddour is essentially all-powerful - if he wanted a senior-driver testing bill, it could emerge tomorrow.

Instead, he tries to pass the buck. “We couldn’t pull it together,” Baddour says.

Pull what together? Since when is Beacon Hill a democracy?

The fact is the same Legislature that could shove Speaker Sal DiMasi down our throats and gives itself pay raises in a recession could pass a bill on elderly driving anytime it so desired. Speaker Robert DeLeo and Senate President Therese Murray could have the legislation on Gov. Deval Patrick’s desk in time for lunch.

They can do it, but they won’t. Our pols won’t step up on behalf of 4-year-olds like Diya because kids can’t vote. But seniors never miss an election. You can laugh and call them Grandpa Simpson or the Golden Girls, but among legislators they’ve got a better nickname: core primary voters.

During last year’s presidential primary, an 86-year-old driving to the polls at a Randolph elementary school veered his car into a crowd of second-graders, nearly killing a girl. How did Massachusetts pols react? More testing for older folks?

Nope. Some opted instead to close their schools on Election Day.


A memorial grows at the scene on...
A memorial grows at the scene on
Washington St. in Stoughton where
Dija Patel ,4, was struck and killed
by an elderly driver while crossing
route 138. (DNN Staff photo)


Bernabei, Graham, O'Reilly, Carr, Siciliano
Al Siciliano
Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Surprise! Sal DiMasi's lawyer convicted felon...

Article 6-15-09

And had ties to Mob



By Howie Carr
DNN Staff -
EXCLUSIVE!
Monday, Jun. 15, 2009

Why would Sal DiMasi hire as one of his attorneys a convicted felon who went to prison for conspiring with the Mafia underboss of Boston to subvert a 1981 federal organized-crime probe?

The lawyer is William Cintolo, and if Sal wants a glimpse into his likely future, all he has to do is go to the Bureau of Prisons Web site - bop.gov - and type in his lawyer’s name under “Inmate Locator.” It comes back:

“William Cintolo 14829-038 62-White-M (release date)12-05-1988.”

Sal has conclusively proven that he’s not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree - trophy wife, allegedly taking checks, doing business with dolts and rats - but this is really embarrassing.

Now Sal hires a guy who did Club Fed time for conspiring with Mafia boss Gerry Angiulo to stop a witness from testifying against La Cosa Nostra. I couldn’t believe it when I saw Cintolo driving his law partner Tom Kiley’s black Jag at DiMasi’s first court appearance last week.

But on Tuesday, Cintolo was a no-show at Sal’s arraignment. So I called Kiley to find out what was going on.

“How can I not help you today?” Kiley said.

Is Cintolo really representing Sal?

“He filed a notice of appearance, didn’t he?”

Yeah, but he wasn’t there Tuesday.

“Look, if there was any problem with Bill Cintolo, he wouldn’t be my partner, would he?”

So there you have it. Here’s what put Sal DiMasi’s lawyer in the can: In 1981, he had as a client a Combat Zone bartender named Walter LaFreniere. Gerry Angiulo was worried LaFreniere was going to testify before a grand jury investigating Mafia crime in Boston.

According to the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, Cintolo was a “regular participant” in conversations with Angiulo at his underworld headquarters on Prince Street. Neither of them knew that the feds were taping all of their conversations.

One day Angiulo and the boys, including Cintolo, were discussing another possible informant. Let’s join the narrative:

“In response to a query by Cintolo, Angiulo gave the following chilling command: ‘I don’t want to know about this guy no more. I want (LCN associate Skinny) Kazonis to go see him . . . We’ll . . . kill him once and for all.”

The court’s conclusion about Sal DiMasi’s attorney: “In any realistic light, the most authentic victim of Cintolo’s behavior was not his nominal client, but the due administration of justice.”

And now he represents Sal DiMasi, the third House speaker in a row to go down on a federal rap. Why are we not surprised?


William Cintolo.
Meet William Cintolo (above), a convicted felon who
also had
ties to the mob, now representing ex House
Speaker Sal DiMasi on
federal corruption charges.

(DNN Staff photo)



Bernabei, Graham, O'Reilly, Carr, Siciliano
Al Siciliano
Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.



Wednesday, June 10, 2009

'Hurtful voters bewilder reps...

Article 6-11-09



So why don't pols do something in favor of voters?

by Michael Graham
DNN Staff - EXCLUSIVE!
Thursday, Jun. 11, 2009

Boo hoo hoo.

The Beacon Hill Boys are - to quote Rep. Denis Guyer of Dalton in the Boston Globe-Democrat - “shocked” to discover that the public thinks they’re a bunch of incompetent crooks. According to Guyer, passing motorists are flipping him the bird.

Other legislators are puzzled by a flood of angry e-mails and phone calls after their vote to save the “hack holidays” of Evacuation Day and Bunker Hill Day. They’re assailed in appearances with complaints about expected toll and tax hikes.

Voters are outraged, and our legislators don’t know why. They’re hurt, confused. As longtime Rep. David Flynn put it: “The pressure is quite severe from constituents. And it’s only natural to try and blame someone.”

Note that phrase “try and blame someone.”

Not “hold us responsible,” but “try and blame.” This is the same Rep. Flynn who joined with fellow Democrats to overwhelmingly return Sal DiMoney to the speaker’s chair in January. The same Democrats who gave the sales tax hike a veto-proof majority. And now they complain that they’re being turned into scapegoats as we voters randomly assign blame?

Massachusetts Democrats remind me of the drunk who smoked two packs a day and spent his spare time in a brothel. One day he goes to the doctor and, after his exam, the doctor says “You’ve got lung cancer, cirrhosis, and the clap.”

The drunk looks toward heaven and cries, “Why did this happen to me?”

Why? We just watched the third House speaker in a row indicted by the feds; a shameless vote to save the $5 million worth of “hack holidays”; and a legislative committee reviewing the ethics bill promptly threw out the press and met in secret.

All in the same week. And you can’t fathom why we might be a tad annoyed?

This wouldn’t be so bad if our full-time, salaried legislators could sneak in some real work between ripoffs. But they don’t.

It’s no secret the state has a problem with elderly drivers. In fact, last week also saw a plague of seniors crashing their Town Cars into buildings, bike riders and even a somber gathering of war veterans.

But even as the bodies fly and store fronts shatter, our lawmakers refuse to discuss, much less pass, reasonable new testing requirements for seniors.

When it comes to protecting government workers and union perks, Beacon Hill will bear any burden and pay any price (with our money, of course).

If these low-rent government grifters had the decency to at least be embarrassed by their actions, it wouldn’t be so annoying. But they aren’t. They honestly think they’re doing a good job.

“We’re doing the important work that the people send us to Beacon Hill to do,” said Rep. David Linsky (D-Natick) in response to the Sal DiMoney indictment.

Work? What “work”? It’s still possible in Massachusetts to legally give a cash “gift” to a state senator. A 95-year-old can renew her driver’s license without a test. The country’s worst-run toll road is still threatening a toll hike. And the Legislature is trying to charge us a sales tax on the tax we’ve already paid when we buy beer and wine. Literally a “tax” tax.

And you guys on Beacon Hill are bothered when voters flip you the bird? You’re lucky they aren’t flipping over your car.



While pols tax and continue to get rich, voters
let them have it. (Illustration photo, by DNN Staff)



Bernabei, Graham, O'Reilly, Carr, Siciliano
Al Siciliano
Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.








Sunday, June 7, 2009

Voters conned and ask for more

Article 6-8-09



Mindless voters continue to elect own torture


by Michael Graham
DNN Staff - EXCLUSIVE!
Monday, Jun. 8, 2009

Everything I need to know about Massachusetts voters I learned from Mrs. Clark Rockefeller.

Testifying against Christian Karl Gewurztraminer (or whatever his unpronounceable German name is), Sandra Boss explained how a super-smart biz whiz could fall for a con-job creep.

“It’s possible that one can be brilliant and amazing in one area of one’s life and pretty stupid in another.’‘

To coin a phrase, “Yes, we can.” On Beacon Hill, it happens every day.

Bay Staters are among the nation’s most affluent and well-educated. About 75 percent of our high school grads go to college. Almost 40 percent of adults have degrees. Our median income is 25 percent higher than the national average.

Yet these “brilliant and amazing” citizens repeatedly vote themselves one of America’s most corrupt and incompetent governments.

Three indicted speakers - and counting. Empty legislative offices with fulltime paid staffs. Pension perks for incumbents so lousy that they’re finally forced out.

What sort of voters put up with this?

Meanwhile, our pols don’t hide from corruption, they celebrate it. When they re-elected Sal DiMasi speaker, everyone knew he was under investigation. But only seven Democrats withheld their votes. The rest were with Rep. Jim Fagan, who bragged, “We are direct descendants of patriots and heroes!” - a comment that must have had Sam Adams drinking in his grave.

It’s the arrogance that comes from knowing you can get away with anything. That’s why hearing Boss’ testimony was so painful.

She - like our voters - is smart, capable and affluent. He - like our government - was an abusive con artist without a cent to his name.

He fed her the most bogus lines: his Rockefeller connections, the Federal Reserve, even the Trilateral Commission. (What, the Illuminati lose your application, Karl?) And she fell for it all.

Just like Bay Staters who bought Gov. Deval Patrick’s promise that he’d never raise our gas taxes or tolls, or the bogus Beacon Hill spin that a sales tax hike today means no more tax hikes tomorrow.

Suckers.

Boss’ story got even more bizarre when she described going cold and hungry on a six-figure salary because Karl wouldn’t raise her allowance. An allowance of her money!

Because Karl - like our state government - never earned a dime himself, but thought he had the right to spend every penny.

Why was Boss afraid of him? She paid all the bills. Why didn’t she just throw the bum out?

Good question. It’s one I’d like to ask every Bay Stater who voted down Question 1.

Every couple of Novembers, hordes of hungry, shivering voters schlep to the polls to re-elect the same gang of goons who abused them the previous two years.

How are we so different from “Mrs. Rockefeller”?

At least Sandra Boss can claim to be duped. Massachusetts voters know exactly what we’re getting, and we keep coming back for more.

We’re not dupes, we’re dopes. And until we start treating incumbents like they’re Bavarian con men with bad hair, that’s never going to change.


Voter registration push ahead of Wednesday deadline
While voters cast their vote, do they really vote
for the candidate that is right on the issues, or
base their decision on the party they belong to?
(DNN Staff photo)



Bernabei, Graham, O'Reilly, Carr, Siciliano
Al Siciliano
Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.


Saturday, June 6, 2009

Deval Patrick should take page out of his own $1.35M book

Article 6-6-09



Gov. Patrick pockets big time - Keeps it secret


by Howie Carr
DNN Staff - EXCLUSIVE!
Saturday, Jun.6, 2009

Shhhhh - keep it under your hat, because nobody’s supposed to know. But Deval Patrick grabbed an extra $382,500 last year on top of his governor’s salary of $140,535.

And Deval didn’t even report the mega-score on his annual sworn statement of financial interests to the State Ethics Commission. Surely the governor plans to close such unconscionable loopholes in his “landmark” ethics reform package.

Deval pocketed a $450,000 book advance (minus a 15 percent cut to his literary agent). But nothing was reported because a book advance apparently isn’t covered under “employment and other associations with businesses.”

Actually, Deval’s advance is $1.35 million, pretty damn good for a first-time author who’s never been on “American Idol” or tested positive for steroids. Deval will get another third of the money - $450,000 - when his (or some ghostwriter’s) manuscript is accepted, and a final $450,000 when it’s published.

So the governor continues his moonlighting - or should I say moonbatlighting. Working title: “Up From Texaco.”

No doubt he’ll be working hard on the tome this weekend out at his mansion in Richmond, after he delivers his not-at-all-anticipated speech to the Democratic state convention in Springfield.

Attending today’s dreary convention is proof that Deval is running for re-election. More evidence: the fact that his operatives, when they’re not testifying before the Sal DiMasi grand jury, continue trying to put a rocket in the pocket of Tim Cahill.

Before addressing the moonbats, Deval will attend a breakfast this morning with Rep. Mike Capuano, who seems to be running for Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat against Attorney General Martha Coakley. The feds indicted another crooked House speaker this week. Martha devoted much of her week to making sure lots of moonbat delegates today are wearing her T-shirts.

Imagine Deval drafting the chapter in his book about this wonderful weekend:

“The rain had stopped. It was a beautiful spring Saturday morning - it always is for the convention. But here I was, stuck inside Hampden’s Halitosis Hall. Tim Murray, my tubby lieutenant governor, was supposed to introduce me. He was slathering butter on a blueberry muffin - by my count at least his third of the morning. ‘Tim,’ I said, ‘do you know how many calories are in those things?’ ”

Sal DiMasi gets lugged for $57,000 in payoffs. Deval is going to end up with $1.35 million for a book absolutely nobody will ever read, and he doesn’t even report the income. Where’s the justice here, Mistah Speakah?


Deval Patrick
Gov. Deval Patrick collected an extra $382,500
on
top of his $140,535 salary last year but went
undetected.
(DNN Staff photo)



Bernabei, Graham, O'Reilly, Carr, Siciliano
Al Siciliano
Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.


Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Bay State run by men of steal

Article 6-4-09

State's highest power, ex House
Speaker Sal DiMasi and three

associates, indicted on federal
corruption charges




by Howie Carr
DNN Staff - EXCLUSIVE!
Thursday, Jun. 4, 2009

This isn’t a democracy, it’s a kleptocracy.

Three in a row - three House speakers in a row indicted, and two convicted. And poor Sal DiMasi, this time I think the G-men are finally going to have to throw one of those crooked hacks into prison. A speaker indicted has become a standing headline. It’s expected, like the archbishop of Boston getting his red hat.

Try not to let it destroy your faith in the integrity of the Massachusetts General Court.

To understand how thoroughly corrupt this entire system has become, consider the connections among everyone in this rancid tale. Sal’s lawyer Tom Kiley used to represent Senate President Billy Bulger in his travails and is now a business partner of Bulger’s successor, Bob Travaglini.

Bulger’s mentor in politics was the late Sonny McDonough, whose son Dickie is also indicted. Dickie McDonough’s lawyer is Tom Dreschler, partner of Felon Finneran. Finneran is the unspeakable hack speaker, pathetic radio talk-show host and on-the-verge-of-being-disbarred lobbyist who preceded DiMasi. The Felon went down on an obstruction of justice rap.

After fleeing the State House, Felon Finneran took over the Mass Biotech Council. When he pleaded guilty, claiming his mind, such as it is, was addled by Advil, the Felon had to give up his $400,000-a-year job at the Council.

He was succeeded by Robert Coughlin, then a rep from Dedham, whose name now turns up on page 10 of the DiMasi indictment as “the sponsor for two educational budget amendments relating to technology” - i.e., the bills for which Sal “earned” the $57,000 he so badly needed to keep his trophy wife, Debbie, in the style to which she had become accustomed.

Coughlin, who in the House was merely a go-along-to-get-along dupe, is not charged. But if you’re on the board of the Biotech Council, you’ve got to be at least a bit chagrined about your recent hires.

Another indictee is Richard Vitale, Sal’s accountant and holder of his third mortgage. Vitale was initially represented by Richie Egbert, who is now deceased. But when Felon Finneran was trying to stay out of prison, his lawyer was . . . Richie Egbert.

Here’s my favorite quote, from (what else?) an e-mail:

“Sal said when he wants something done within his domain he is ultimately going to get what he wants.”

I hope Sal now wants to go to prison, because my guess is that’s where he’s headed.


Ex House Speaker Sal DiMasi
DNN phographer zooms in on Ex House
Speaker Sal DiMasi just as indictments on
federal corruption charges were being read
to him.



Bernabei, Graham, O'Reilly, Carr, Siciliano
Al Siciliano
Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.