Mitt's no Massachusetts Moderate

by Donnie Bernabei
Thursday, Jan.12, 2012

Is Mitt Romney really a Massachusetts Moderate like some make him out to be?

Well, it's a lot of bull plain and simple. And this is directed at you, Newt Gingrich and especially to those liberal media outlets who paint Mitt as one.

You can decide after reading the facts about Mitt Romney when he was governor of Massachusetts from '03 to '06. With me being a life-long resident of my state, I have seen many governors come and go. But I've yet to see a governor like Mitt Romney who fought for the taxpayers and who saved them from enormous tax increases under an 85 percent liberal legislature.

Here are just some of the facts while Romney governed in which are hardly told:

1) Mitt worked for free during his four year term as governor of Massachusetts and threw his salary into the $3 billion deficit he faced.

2) During the height of a recession caused by the 9/11 attacks on our country, Mitt turned a $3 billion deficit into an $800 million surplus without raising your everyday taxes.

3) Illegal aliens were banned and ordered to be deported out of Massachusetts after Mitt mandated a policy to rid them, only until Gov. Patrick abolished his mandate when he became governor in '07. And since then the state tanked in any category you could think of.

4) Mitt mandated a state-run health care policy which insured all Massachusetts residents. It only effected the two percent who weren't insured and saved the taxpayers billions of dollars at the time, because it also didn't allow rich people and illegal aliens to show up at our clinics to claim free health benefits at the expense of taxpayers. And most important, Mitt's health care mandate did not cost $1 trillion and it didn't drain billions of dollars from Medicare unlike Obamacare will eventually do.

5) Mitt cut taxes 19 times and vetoed 800 bills under an 85 percent liberal legislature while he governed Massachusetts.

6) It took a driver to be killed in one of our Big Dig tunnels for the liberal Massachusetts legislature to give Mitt full control of the $15 billion Big Dig project after he fought so hard for. In return, Mitt fired head honcho Matt Amorello for his mismanagement of the project who overseen faulty construction work on the tunnel, which eventually led to a huge cement ceiling block to fall and crush a driver to death. This was just one out of the many structural defects that occurred under Amorello. The original price for the project was $2.5 billion and ended up being $13.4 billion over budgeted. Most of the cost over runs that torched taxpayer's wallets occurred under Amorello.

7) Under Romney, 40,000 jobs were created during tough economic times. When Romney was sworn in as governor in January 2003, Massachusetts was reeling from the end of a deep recession. With an economy more pegged to technology than most states, Massachusetts took longer to recover. At the time, the state's unemployment rate was at 5.6 percent, compared with a low of 2.8 percent just two years earlier before Romney became governor.

The jobless rate would keep rising through Romney's first year in office with a weak economy, topping out at 6 percent in August after his first year. By December 2006, Romney's last full month in office, it had fallen to 4.7 percent thanks to job creation. A drop of less than 1 percent, meaning the addition of about 40,000 jobs, may seem like a modest achievement during a very tough recovery period after the 9/11 attacks on our country. The fact is Massachusetts ended up being in a lot better shape than many other states across the country under a Romney leadership.

So these are just some of the facts while Romney governed in Massachusetts regardless of what else you are hearing about him.

Again, I will stress the fact that Romney became governor during the height of a recession caused by the 9/11 attacks and governed Massachusetts under one of the most liberal legislatures on the planet. Such a legislature was 85 percent Democrat. And such accomplishments by Romney proves to me that he is more of a conservative than what Newt Gingrich and the liberal medias paint him as.

I find it to be alarming that truths of one being's record are simply being distorted. Mitt was no Massachusetts Moderate.

In this July 2006 photo, Massachusetts Turnpike

Chairman Matt Amorello talks to reporters about

his forced resignation by Gov. Mitt Romney; this

after a cement ceiling panel came crashing down and

crushed a driver to death in the I95 tunnel.

(DNN File Photo)

Gov. keeps your $$ working for hacks

While your paycheck decreases, managers get $4 grand pay raise

There are two Americas. John Edwards was right.

But not in the way that the Anthony Weiner of the last decade could have ever imagined.

The two Americas are the Dreaded Private Sector, where the real unemployment rate hovers close to 20 percent, and housing prices have taken a bigger plunge than they did during the Great Depression.

And then there’s Public Sector America, where the good times never end.

Just ask Gov. Deval Patrick. On a day when the stock market lost another 172 points, he announced that he’s handing out still more pay raises, this time to 4,000 state “managers,” also known as hacks.

What a week. The secretary of state, Bill Galvin, gets a $10 million settlement from the thieves at Goldman Sachs, and the very next day Deval hands over the entire score to a different group of sticky-fingered payroll patriots.

No money for the state workers who actually do the menial labor, but plenty for the “managers.”

You know the kind of people who “manage” in state government. A lot of them drive state cars — with untraceable license plates, if they’re really connected. And they’ve all got fancy titles loaded with diminutives — “special assistant to the deputy director for the associate undersecretary.”

They telecommute on Fridays. And on snow days, well, would you care to guess if they’re essential or non-essential, or should I use the new hack euphemisms, “emergency” and “non-emergency.”

In case you were wondering, Deval’s 4,000 campaign contributors, I mean managers, didn’t really get a raise. It was a “wage adjustment.”

It had to be done, Deval said in a statement, in order to “retain and recruit a talented and competitive work force.”

Are you kidding, Deval? Has anyone ever quit the public payroll except under extreme personal duress? Like, as part of a plea bargain. Deval’s flack said that state managers have made “incredible sacrifices.” Right — several agencies have cancelled their weekly popover eating contests at Anthony’s Pier 4.

There’s a Robert Frost poem, “The Road Not Taken.” It sums up the difference between the two Americas.

“Two roads diverged in a wood, and I — I took the one less traveled by.”

The hack road, in other words. It’s less traveled by because it was Monday and everybody phoned in sick. Then they “worked” for three days and all of them banged in sick again on Friday. The road less taken . . .

“And that has made all the difference.”

It did for Tom Kinton. If the outgoing boss of Massport had taken the DPS Road, he’d probably be working now at a service desk somewhere in Shoppers World. Instead, he walks out the door groaning under the weight of all his gelt — a $200,000 pension, $459,000 in what is called unused sick time, another $80,000 in insurance policy dividends . . .

Getting a hack job at an early age. To paraphrase Frost, that makes all the difference.

GOOD TIMES ROLL: Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick
just OK’d a raise for the state’s 4,000 managers.




Donnie Howie Michael Bill

Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

Taxes keep rising despite property Deval-uation

How can this be? The value of your home keeps going down, yet the property taxes never stop going up.

Back in 2006, didn’t candidate Deval Patrick promise to cut property taxes? If he does have to testify under oath at Sal DiMasi’s corruption trial next week, I hope someone asks him about that pledge, just to establish his reputation for veracity, or lack thereof.

“Governor, did you know you were lying when you vowed to cut property taxes, or maybe we all misunderstood you, and you really meant to say you were going to cut property values? Which is it?”

It’s that time of year again. Proposition 2 1⁄2 override season. Saturday they passed one in Scituate. Wherever you go, it’s the same old story. The selectmen say they’ve made “Draconian cuts.” They’re dealing with “fixed costs.”

Fixed costs means they can’t lay off their wife’s nephew.

Isn’t municipal government grand? I can sum it up in two words: Willie Lantigua.

And so the tax bills just keep on rising. Just ask Kathy from Foxboro.

“I bought my house in 2006 for $330,000, it’s now worth $240,000,” she was saying the other night. “The town claimed I had a ‘finished basement.’ I took the assessor down to see it. It has a dirt floor, only it was mud, because it still had 3 inches of water in it from the flooding last spring.”

Surely the town did the right thing by you, Kathy.

“I got a $17 reduction. I thought it was a joke when I saw the bill. Seventeen bucks.”

Another Draconian cut. Nowadays, everybody is running down to City or Town Hall to file for an abatement. But don’t forget to call ahead. A lot of these places close early now.

Town Hall’s got a million excuses for why your tax bill keeps going up.

State law, don’t you know. What’s theirs is theirs, and what’s yours is theirs.

And God forbid anybody suggests maybe level-funding the school budget. They immediately threaten to cancel the football season.

“I bought my house in Springfield in 2005 for $150,000,” a guy named Joe was saying, “and I just sold it for $95,000. But my property taxes went from $2,500 to $3,000.”

And why do you have to file for a new abatement every year? If the house was overvalued last year, why does it go back to the old overvaluation this year?

Meanwhile, on Beacon Hill, the state hacks were holding a hearing last week to raise the income tax. They call it “An Act to Invest in Our Communities.”

Invest in our communities — sorry, I already did. In my own, and in Willie Lantigua’s.

What promise? No wonder why Deval Patrick will
not run another term. So many broken promises.
Property tax relief was just one of them.




Donnie Howie Michael Bill

Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

Fuel for firing Obama

by Michael Graham


President would raise dependency on foreign oil


This is the headline from The New York Times Web site yesterday: “Obama Lays Out Plan to Cut Reliance on Fuel Imports.”

Did I say “headline?” I meant “laugh line.”

Because President Barack Obama giving a speech on increasing U.S. oil production is like Charlie Sheen lecturing me to “Just Say No.” It inspires more than merely a raised eyebrow. We’re in full-on Pelosi Forehead territory here.

Obama yesterday set a goal of reducing the amount of oil we import by 3 million barrels a day over the next 10 years. And part of the solution is his hard work promoting more domestic production, he managed to say with a straight face.

Barack Obama — oil producer? The same Obama who rejected any new drilling during the 2008 campaign?

Who actually suggested we forget drilling and “properly inflate our tires?”

Who imposed a moratorium on all new drilling in 2010?

The same President Obama who . . . well, I’ll let the liberal-leaning Washington Post take over from here:

“When was the last time an American president stood before an audience in a foreign country and announced that he looked forward to importing more of its oil? Answer: Just over a week ago,” the Post wrote, referring to Obama’s visit to Brazil, where he promised American subsidies for Brazilian offshore drilling, and the promise that “when you’re ready to start selling, we want to be one of your best customers.”

So Obama’s plan to reduce our dependency on foreign oil is to travel to other countries, offer to pay them to drill off their own coasts so we can buy more of their oil? Please tell me I’m missing something here.

If Obama were urging everyone to develop their oil reserves, that would be one thing. But while he’s subsidizing Brazil’s oil workers, he’s simultaneously punishing ours.

In December, he announced that his moratorium on oil exploration off our own East and West coasts and the eastern Gulf of Mexico would continue “indefinitely.”

He still opposes drilling in the vast, empty Alaskan wasteland that is the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. And the American Petroleum Institute pointed out yesterday that “based on current policy, that this could be the first year since 1957 the U.S. doesn’t issue a single new drilling permit.”

In other words, “Read Obama’s lips: No new oil.”

So how do we cut down on imports?

Why, by getting more production out of our existing wells, of course!

Yeah, about that . . .

“[The Department of Energy] predicted that domestic offshore oil production will fall 13 percent this year from 2010 due to the moratorium and the slow return to drilling,” The Wall Street Journal noted in an editorial earlier this year, “ . . . a loss of about 220,000 barrels of oil a day.”

When Obama claimed yesterday that existing oil production is high, he’s telling the truth — but it has absolutely nothing to do with his anti-production policies.

According to Amy Harder at National Journal magazine, “most, if not all, of the production increase recorded is likely due to action that predates Obama, since Obama didn’t take any major action expanding offshore drilling his first year in office.”

Guess what, Amy — he still hasn’t.

“Barack the Internationalist” I’ll believe. “Barack Obama, Repairer of Race Relations,” I’ll tag along. Even “Barack Obama, Savior Of The Banking Industry (especially Goldman Sachs)” I can take.

But “Barack the Oil Bringer?” No way.

Everyone already knows about the president’s true energy policy. In fact, this headline appeared in the Christian Science Monitor just a couple of weeks ago:

“Gas prices too high? Obama may not think so. He’s pumped to use high oil prices.”

Tell us something we don’t know.

President Obama, salutes as he steps off of Marine One onto the

South Lawn of the White House, to announce his 10 year plan on

reducing dependency on foreign oil.

Donnie Howie Michael Bill

Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

No leadership on Libya

Obama's crafty but not smart

by Michael Graham
Tuesday, Mar. 22, 2011

Building on the success of “Are You Smarter Than A 5th Grader?” Fox Television has begun production on a sure-fire hit: “Are You Smarter Than The President Of The United States?”

And in this show — everybody wins!

That’s because almost every American citizen — with the possible exception of the members of the Massachusetts congressional delegation — is smarter about Libya than Barack Obama

Really — you are, right now, more intelligent than the Smartest President Ever.

For example, would you launch a military attack in Libya without being able to answer the question: “Why am I attacking Libya?” No way.

But that’s just what Obama has done. Are we attacking Libya to get rid of kooky Col. Moammar Gadhafi? Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says yes.

“We do believe that a final result of any negotiations would have to be the decision by [Gadhafi] to leave,” she told Reuters on Friday.

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. Carter Ham, who’s overseeing the action, both say “no.” They can see Gadhafi still being in power when this mission is over.

And Obama?

He’s playing soccer on the streets of Rio with some school kids. Apparently “My Pet Goat” hasn’t been translated into Portuguese.

“The international community rallied and said we have to stop any potential atrocities in Libya, and provided a broad mandate in addition to that specific task,” Obama said yesterday after arriving in Chile.

So it’s just a humanitarian mission. Obama says “no” regime change.

But wait — there’s more!

“I also have stated that it is U.S. policy that Gadhafi has to go,” he added. So we’re finally going to get rid of the terror-sponsoring SOB who’s killed hundreds of Americans in terrorist attacks, including the Lockerbie bombing. Right?

“We’ve got a wide range of tools in addition to our military efforts to support that policy,” Obama concluded.

So we’re just on a humanitarian mission that has nothing to do with toppling Gadhafi, except that it’s our policy to topple him, only we’re not going to use the military.

We’re only going to blow up stuff that won’t knock Gadhafi out of office? Terrific.

At this point, allow me to be the 3,749th opinion writer to point out that a policy which a) stops Gadhafi from committing atrocities against his people while b) leaving him in power to commit future atrocities is idiotic. It’s like saying, “We don’t want to catch the Boston Strangler, we just want to make sure he stays home watching TV for now.”

Some smart people believe that America standing aside and allowing Gadhafi to turn eastern Libya into the new Bosnia or Darfur would be a geopolitical disaster. They say it would undermine our allies and hurt America’s credibility across the Middle East.

Other smart people say Tripoli isn’t worth the blood of a single American airman, and we should leave the Libyans to have their civil war.

But nobody, other than the president, is saying both.

Rudy Giuliani, who knows a thing or two about leadership during crisis, told National Review yesterday that “if [Obama] thought that it would be in America’s national interest to remove Gadhafi, he should have already outlined steps two, three and four. It does not seem like he has done that.”

As for launching a no-fly zone and promising no ground forces, Giuliani notes, “I don’t know why he has to decide that right now except for political reasons. Strategically, you want Gadhafi thinking that we might use troops.”

What the president really wants people thinking is “Whatever happens in Libya, none of it is Obama’s fault.”

In this image taken from Libya State TV, broadcast,
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi says he will fight
imposed "no fly zone."

Donnie Howie Michael Bill

Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

'D'stands for dysfunctional, not dynasty

Patriot fans finish last again


by Howie Carr
Thursday, Jan. 20, 2011

There is no joy in Shillville — the “dynasty” got a bone in its throat for the sixth consecutive year.

It’s over. Now, please, can all of you jock-sniffers, cheerleaders, frontrunners and pom-pom boys just Get Over It and move on to the next overhyped sporting event.

I’ve got it — Beanpot Fever Sweeps Hub!

Oh, the inconsolable gloom that envelops Patsies Nation. I heard that on Sunday night after the stomping, some local loser issued this plaintive cry:

“My win-tah is spoiled!”

On Sunday, “we” were going to the Super Bowl. Then “they” lost.

Really, it would take a heart of stone not to laugh. But now it’s time to take the Patriots flag down from your front door, and it’s way past time to get that Patriots spare-tire cover off the back of the SUV, not to mention to put away the Triple XL Brady No. 12 sweatshirts.

Most of all, it’s time for these overwrought, overweight yahoos to stop thinking. There’s something not quite healthy about this obsession a certain class of males around here has for Mr. Gisele Bundchen.

Like, why do they hate the supermodel so much? Are they ... jealous? Some of these guys, when you hear them breathing heavily as they gush about Brady, you start thinking two words: restraining order.

The fellowship of the miserable, as Rick Pitino once described this sad collection, gravitates to two radio outlets: one appeals to 30-year-old men who live in their mom’s basement — the other to 50-year-old men who live in their mom’s basement.

Remember Brady’s fender-bender in the Back Bay in September. The basement boys reacted as if al-Qaeda had struck New York again. One of the room-temperature-IQ producers called 911. Like, it’s, like, Tom Brady, man, the greatest quarterback ever.

Host No. 1: I love Tom Brady more than you!

Host No. 2: No you don’t, I love Tom Brady much more than you do!

Host No. 1: Rah-rah-rah....

Host No. 2: ... sis-boom-bah.

The fans, the hosts — everybody sounds the same. Listen for two minutes and you’ll feel like you’re home on the range. Seldom is heard a discouraging word. There’s a bar right between the two stations, Hogan’s Run. If the two stations put up microphones at either end of the bar and let every Brighton boozer who wandered in just belch and burp to their heart’s content, no one listening in their car would ever notice any difference.

Hey, Brady, one last thing to think about in the offseason. A haircut.

A depressed fan remains sitting in the stands at Gillette
Stadium Sunday in disbelief over the Patriots shocking
loss against the Jets. He was later escorted by security out
of the stadium.



Donnie Howie Michael Bill

Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

Hey pols, keep the $300 and buy a clue

Gov. Patrick trims legislative salaries


by Howie Carr
Thursday, Jan. 6, 2011

A $300 pay cut for the Legislature? Gov. Patrick, is this some kind of joke?

Six bucks a week? As in, that was how much the tolls were supposed to go up a few years back for most commuters, and somebody like Jim Aloisi scoffed and said it was only a sandwich a week.

So six bucks a week was nothing when it was coming out of our hides, but now that it’s coming out of yours, it’s... symbolism.

You want some symbolism, solons — let me give you a symbolic number.

The number is 100. You might even call it iconic. One hundred dollars, as in, the annual pay of a New Hampshire legislator. You know, New Hampshire, the state with no income tax and no sales tax.

Massachusetts has a 6.25 percent sales tax and a 5.3 percent income tax, and our reps’ base pay — and probably half of them are now at least $7,500 above because of their “leadership bonuses” — is now $61,133.

What is wrong with this picture?

I suppose any cut is better than nothing, but a savings of $65,000 is thin gruel indeed. Another Felon Finneran scheme goes awry — back in 1996 none of the hacks ever assumed their pay would go down, but now it has. But only until something can be worked out, perhaps by jacking up the per diem, the daily travel allowance that ranges between $10 and $110. After all, the price of gas is going up.

So, they get base pay of $61G, probably half of them (including everyone in the Senate) gets that “bonus,” the third that live more than 50 miles from the State House get a $150-a-day write-off every day the Legislature is in session.

Then there are the per diems, and the campaign-finance accounts that pay for their cars and their cell phones and their bar tabs and every other damn thing . . .

Three hundred buck pay cut?

This new year is getting off to a rather strange start at the State House. The Parole Board is enmeshed in scandal, and has the Globe even mentioned that the chairman is a former cop who was Deval’s driver in the 2006 campaign? (That’s OK, we’ve mentioned it enough for both papers.)

The new, unindicted speaker, up to his eyeballs in the Probation Department scandal, is now screaming about parole — call it Operation Change the Subject.

Deval, meanwhile, says let’s not rush to judgment, meaning don’t rush to judgment about me.

All the statewide officeholders below Deval will be sworn in on Jan. 19. That’s the first anniversary of Marsha Coakley’s stomping in the special Senate election by Scott Brown. Marsha has decided to be sworn in on the big day at the Perkins School for the Blind. No, I’m not making this stuff up.

In an interview, Gov. Deval Patrick says he will
trim salaries of lawmakers mounting the state's
$2 billion deficit



Donnie Howie Michael Bill

Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

Nothing in the works

Mass. losing more jobs after election

by Michael Graham
Monday, Nov. 15, 2010

You’ll be happy to know that your government is hard at work spending your money. It’s the taxpayers who are left unemployed.

In 2008, Gov. Deval Patrick promised that he could create hundreds of thousands of biotech jobs in Massachusetts if we’d just give him $1 billion of our money for projects supported by his pals (and political donors) in biotech and Big Pharma. The Democrat-dominated Legislature gave him his wish and now Beacon Hill is throwing around $100 million to “create jobs.”

And how’s that workin’ out for ya? Here’s the headline from Tuesday’s Boston Herald:

“Biotech aid falls flat.”

“The state’s $6 million handout to biotech giants Genzyme Corp. and Biogen Idec didn’t prevent those firms from issuing 270 pink slips in the Bay State last week - raising doubts about Gov. Deval Patrick’s ambitious plan to create 250,000 life sciences jobs in 10 years,” Jessica Van Sack reported. She added, in a moment of profound understatement, that Patrick’s promise of a quarter-million new jobs “now seems even more far-fetched.”

Yeah, well “fetch” this: In the week since Patrick was re-elected, we’ve already lost more than 1,000 private-sector jobs, and more cuts at companies like Raytheon are on the way. Interestingly, the Associated Press reports that Patrick was asked about the upcoming cuts at Raytheon in the last days of the campaign, and rumors that he’d asked them to hold off until after Election Day.

“Patrick bristled when asked if he requested Raytheon delay any terminations, saying the company was adding jobs,” the AP reports.

Whatever really happened - and Raytheon’s smart enough to know the value of sucking up to government in a Democratic duchy like Massachusetts - it’s too late. Patrick’s back, the jobs are gone and voters stuck themselves with the tab.

It was embarrassing enough reading reports about “stimulus” jobs that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to “create.” But thanks to our government geniuses, we’re spending money to lose jobs. Instead of generating “green jobs” we’re passing out pink slips.

The Obama administration is a big fan of a California “green jobs” company called Solyndra, for example. So the O-bots gave this politically-connected company $535 million, but instead of adding thousands of net jobs, Solyndra’s actually cutting its payroll by around 150 people. That’s $3.6 million per job lost.

Anyone remember the good ol’ days before Patrick and Barack Obama, when companies laid off their own employees for free?

Meanwhile back in Boston, Mayor Tom Menino dumped $10.5 million of local tax dollars into the W Hotel and Residences project, inspiring yet another headline from Tuesday’s Herald:

“W woes could cost Hub $10M.”

“The city of Boston could be out $10.5 million if the Prudential Insurance Co. of America wins bankruptcy court approval to foreclose on the new W Hotel & Residences,” the Herald reported. That’s more tax money wasted and more jobs lost.

Ah, but there’s one part of the economy that’s growing. This headline from yesterday’s USA Today says it all:

“More federal workers’ pay tops $150,000.”

The number of federal workers earning $150K has doubled under Obama. His new plan? To give them an across-the-board raise.

I’ve got one more headline for you to ponder:

“Mass. Dems sweep state elections.”

Until that headline changes, nothing else will.

It was in June of '08 when Gov. Patrick signed a $1 billion
bill to biotech giants and promised it would create hundreds
of thousands of biotech jobs. Instead the company
announced to cut 270 jobs just last week.

Donnie Howie Michael Bill

Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

Massachusetts, the land of misfit toys

Republicans cleaned House, but not in Massachusetts

by Donnie Boston
EXCLUSIVE!
Monday, Nov. 8, 2010

I told you so.

Republicans last week cleaned House across the country and changed the balance of power in Congress in historic fashion. But people here voted differently, of course. By no means I expected this state to turn Republican, but with a little luck I was hoping for some key seats to at least change hands.

Now that you, the Beautiful People have spoken, here is a brief look on some of the key issues you will face over the next four years.

Sales Tax on Alcohol: You voted 'yes,' which means you don't want to pay an extra 6.25 percent on alcohol. Though, here's a perfect example on how your elected officials go against the will of the voters right after you re-elect them. They enjoy overriding anything you repeal on the ballot. In the past, you always enjoyed getting hosed anyways.

Sales Tax and Use Tax: You voted 'no' which means you like paying a 25 percent higher tax on anything the government can get their hands on. It doesn't even matter if it's candy, sugar or the works. And it's death to the person who informs you that your taxes got significantly raised across the board last time you chose not to repeal it.

Gov. Deval Patrick: You chose to give Patrick another four years in office, which means you agree with him that your state is on the mend and on the move. It doesn't matter that your state lost 24,000 jobs over the past two months and unemployment has nearly doubled under his watch. You even put aside that your governor has the worst record than any governor who has ever served your state. You are satisfied with this.

Also, you enjoy picking up all the tabs for illegal aliens who continue to arrive in your state illegally under Patrick. And you simply have no problem with these lawbreakers using up all your resources that you are fully paying for.

Under Patrick, you don't even mind that the unemployed keep getting rewarded, like being able to cash in on HD TV's, smokes, booze and the works by using their EBT debit cards. It's really no big deal that your tax dollars provides such luxury for these individuals and that your governor refuses to act on resolving the issue.

Barney Frank: You are pleased that Barney, Chairman of the Housing Finance Committee, supported housing policies that wrecked the national economy. You gave him another term in office even though he caused people to lose their homes and fortunes by lying to them on how their stocks would do good moving forward.

Martha Coakley: You gave Martha another term in office as your attorney general, which means you appreciate the good job she is doing. Never mind that she doesn't understand what illegal means as your attorney general. You even agreed with her when she said during her campaign that it's not illegal to be illegal in Massachusetts. And you also don't mind that she should never investigate any one of her party members who breaks the law, because she depends on their vote when her seat is up for re-election.

Enough of this already. You get the picture that your state, again are going to be filled with these types for another term, thanks to you. I mean, can you imagine another four years of this same old corrupt and irresponsible government?

And speaking of such, haven't you heard? Right after all the “hacks” up on Beacon Hill got re-elected, they got brand new computers and billed them to the taxpayers. And if I were a betting guy, I bet the old ones got launched right into the dumpster rather than into the hands of the FBI.

As far as our state goes, I believe more people that do the right thing by working for a living and paying their taxes and bills on time, will continue to finish last under Patrick, forcing them to flee to another state where they can get better values at cheaper rates. They will continue to be replaced here by low income people, if that, which will continue to cause less tax revenues for the state, creating more deficits like the one you will be facing this coming Fiscal Year--worth $2 billion.

And you can continue to blame the misfits we have for voters in this state who are in need of one thing:

B R A I N S!

In the above photo, Congressman Barney Frank wasted
no time in lashing out against his tormentors during
his victory speech at the Crown Royal Hotel on Election night.

Donnie Howie Michael Bill

Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.

Boot with steal toe is best for this election

Time nears to boot out incumbents

by Donnie Boston
Election Exclusive!
Monday, Nov. 1, 2010

Tomorrow is Election Day, and loons like Deval Patrick will be running for re-election nationwide.

While many voters will vote such Cancer out of office across the country, Massachusetts voters hopefully will do the same at least to some extent. I mean, can anyone name one good thing Deval Patrick has done for you and this state ever since he got elected?

What was that again, governor? Our state is on the mend and on the move? Try telling this to the 24,000 people who lost jobs over the last two months – 21,000 alone in the month of September, which is the biggest one-month job loss in 20 years. Oh, and it's no big deal that 100,000 jobs were lost under your watch either.

I know you want to keep sticking to that figure right up to the very last minute on how the jobless rate recently went from 8.8 percent to 8.4. How about 4.6 percent unemployment when you first came into office? And what about all those people whose unemployment benefits ran out that are not being counted? So much for that so called 8.4 number.

Also, too bad you had to be forced by The Herald to release those numbers on illegal immigration. It's something that you didn't want to hear just before the election. This is why it took you a month to hand them over, or else...

The figures only prevailed that the taxpayers spent $37.5 million in emergency health care last year for illegal aliens. What a shame that Patrick chose to abolish Mitt Romney's mandate of having these individuals arrested on the spot. He wants to keep using the excuse that it's the feds responsibility to act. Blah... Blah... Blah... I mean would it really hurt Patrick to act, knowing that illegals overall cost taxpayers and this state billions of dollars every year? So much for the taxpayers facing a $2 billion deficit this upcoming Fiscal Year. It's just another example of Deval being so far out of touch with taxpayers ever since he became governor.

I can just see it all over again if Patrick gets re-elected and after the mindless voters turn down repealing the sales tax again. You remember what Mumbles did, right? As soon as this loon got re-elected, two weeks later he hosed his own voters by raising the property tax 6 percent. Ditto with Patrick. If he gets re-elected, soon enough I bet your sales tax will be raised to 7 percent. Hey, the Beautiful People had their second chance in the voting booths on how they enjoy paying higher taxes so much. “Thank you sir may I please have another.”

You see, it all comes down to the mindless voters we have in this state. The same old Beautiful people will be out in full force tomorrow to vote in their own torture once again. They are the same individuals who believe in only two things: that John Kerry got hosed in Ohio, and George Bush and Dick Chaney were the ones that brought down the Twin Towers. Moonbats at-large!

Take for instance this one example of a voter in which I was lucky enough to run in to. She asked me to withhold her name, of course, after I asked her one simple question if she will vote for Barney Frank in her district. “We are Democrats and Barney always meant well to everyone. I will vote for him.” this voter says.

I mean what the hell. It's no big deal that Barney wrecked the economy. Remember we are moving forward, and that's a good thing. It was so good that people woke up one day and found out that they lost their fortunes. Stocks only dropped 90 percent under good old Barney, and it was the biggest drop in federal history. Sure, Barney always meant well to everyone. For heaven's sake, vote Bielat for U.S. Congress!

Here's another voter on AG Martha Coakley: “She will get my vote because she is good at what she does,” this voter says. Martha is so good that she even knows that it is not illegal to be illegal in Massachusetts. Don't be as dumb as Martha. Vote McKenna for AG!

Oh, the list of these types goes on.

But I have faith. I've always said that if the “straw” (Tim Cahill) finishes below 10 percent that Baker could have a chance of pulling it off. Right now he is fighting to get eight. And how bad does it get for Patrick when he isn't even considered a shoe-in with the straw and this Stein woman still in the race? Remember, a vote for them is a vote taken away from Baker.

Here's one thing I know: Come early Wednesday morning, many of these Patrick-like incumbents from across the country will have one thing in common:

Sore behinds!

Gov. Patrick is shown above telling an audience
how the state is on the mend and on the move
right after a horrific new jobless report made headlines.

Donnie Howie Michael Bill

Unlike the others, we tell you what's really happening.